PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTLA vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTLA vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTLA achieves a 69.63% return, which is significantly higher than BMY's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NTLA has underperformed BMY with an annualized return of -5.26%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively higher 1.07% annualized return.


NTLA

1D
-3.17%
1M
21.03%
YTD
69.63%
6M
61.89%
1Y
65.22%
3Y*
-28.07%
5Y*
-29.38%
10Y*
-5.26%

BMY

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.58%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
-0.64%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
1.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTLA vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
69.63%-22.90%-61.76%-12.61%-70.49%117.35%270.82%7.47%-28.98%46.61%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
5.24%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NTLA and BMY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTLA:

$1.81B

BMY:

$113.48B

EPS

NTLA:

-$3.58

BMY:

$3.57

PS Ratio

NTLA:

25.43

BMY:

2.34

PB Ratio

NTLA:

2.91

BMY:

5.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTLA:

$66.09M

BMY:

$48.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTLA:

-$33.92M

BMY:

$33.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTLA:

-$299.32M

BMY:

$13.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTLA vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTLA
NTLA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NTLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTLA vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTLABMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.95

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

4.41

-3.00

NTLA vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTLA and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTLA vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTLA drawdown since its inception was -96.45%, which is greater than BMY's maximum drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTLA and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTLABMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.45%

-72.03%

-24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.27%

-12.53%

-58.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.28%

-36.02%

-50.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.45%

-47.67%

-48.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.45%

-47.67%

-48.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-20.09%

-71.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.19%

-22.38%

-34.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.34%

5.51%

+40.83%

Volatility

NTLA vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a higher volatility of 29.47% compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) at 8.49%. This indicates that NTLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTLABMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.47%

8.49%

+20.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.34%

18.04%

+40.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.89%

26.96%

+71.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.41%

24.08%

+57.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.80%

25.30%

+53.50%

Dividends

NTLA vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

NTLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.50%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NTLA vs. BMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
15.05M
11.49B
(NTLA) Total Revenue
(BMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NTLA and BMY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTLA has higher volatility (29.47%) compared to BMY (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTLA dropped -96.45% vs BMY's -72.03%.

BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTLA and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer