NTLA vs. BMY
NTLA (Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.) and BMY (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — NTLA in Biotechnology, BMY in Drug Manufacturers - General. Over the past 10 years, NTLA returned -5.26%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BMY. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTLA vs. BMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTLA achieves a 69.63% return, which is significantly higher than BMY's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NTLA has underperformed BMY with an annualized return of -5.26%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively higher 1.07% annualized return.
NTLA
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 21.03%
- YTD
- 69.63%
- 6M
- 61.89%
- 1Y
- 65.22%
- 3Y*
- -28.07%
- 5Y*
- -29.38%
- 10Y*
- -5.26%
BMY
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 24.26%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
NTLA vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 69.63% | -22.90% | -61.76% | -12.61% | -70.49% | 117.35% | 270.82% | 7.47% | -28.98% | 46.61% |
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 5.24% | 0.11% | 15.81% | -26.14% | 18.98% | 2.88% | 0.41% | 27.74% | -12.90% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTLA and BMY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
NTLA:
$1.81B
BMY:
$113.48B
NTLA:
-$3.58
BMY:
$3.57
NTLA:
25.43
BMY:
2.34
NTLA:
2.91
BMY:
5.65
NTLA:
$66.09M
BMY:
$48.48B
NTLA:
-$33.92M
BMY:
$33.33B
NTLA:
-$299.32M
BMY:
$13.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTLA vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank
NTLA
BMY
NTLA vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTLA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.95 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.41 | 4.41 | -3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTLA vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTLA drawdown since its inception was -96.45%, which is greater than BMY's maximum drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTLA and BMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTLA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.45% | -72.03% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.27% | -12.53% | -58.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.28% | -36.02% | -50.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.45% | -47.67% | -48.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.45% | -47.67% | -48.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.37% | -20.09% | -71.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.19% | -22.38% | -34.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.34% | 5.51% | +40.83% |
Volatility
NTLA vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a higher volatility of 29.47% compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) at 8.49%. This indicates that NTLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTLA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.47% | 8.49% | +20.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.34% | 18.04% | +40.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.89% | 26.96% | +71.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.41% | 24.08% | +57.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.80% | 25.30% | +53.50% |
Dividends
NTLA vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison
NTLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4.50% | 4.60% | 4.24% | 4.44% | 3.00% | 2.36% | 3.69% | 2.55% | 3.08% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 2.17% |
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NTLA vs. BMY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NTLA and BMY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTLA has higher volatility (29.47%) compared to BMY (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTLA dropped -96.45% vs BMY's -72.03%.
BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTLA and BMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer