PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NTLA vs. FVRR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NTLAFVRR
YTD Return-32.50%-14.66%
1Y Return-29.16%-5.68%
3Y Return (Ann)-46.06%-50.58%
5Y Return (Ann)13.54%2.54%
Sharpe Ratio-0.50-0.08
Sortino Ratio-0.430.31
Omega Ratio0.951.04
Calmar Ratio-0.34-0.05
Martin Ratio-1.25-0.22
Ulcer Index24.36%20.41%
Daily Std Dev61.11%57.52%
Max Drawdown-90.02%-94.05%
Current Drawdown-88.36%-92.81%

Fundamentals


NTLAFVRR
Market Cap$2.09B$819.69M
EPS-$5.78$0.30
Total Revenue (TTM)$33.98M$282.85M
Gross Profit (TTM)$26.40M$234.00M
EBITDA (TTM)-$385.36M-$3.71M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between NTLA and FVRR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

NTLA vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NTLA achieves a -32.50% return, which is significantly lower than FVRR's -14.66% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-4.28%
15.52%
NTLA
FVRR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NTLA vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTLA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NTLA, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NTLA, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NTLA, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NTLA, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NTLA, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.25
FVRR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FVRR, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FVRR, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FVRR, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FVRR, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FVRR, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.22

NTLA vs. FVRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTLA Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the FVRR Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTLA and FVRR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.50
-0.08
NTLA
FVRR

Dividends

NTLA vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTLA nor FVRR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NTLA vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTLA drawdown since its inception was -90.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FVRR drawdown of -94.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTLA and FVRR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%-84.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-88.36%
-92.81%
NTLA
FVRR

Volatility

NTLA vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a higher volatility of 14.79% compared to Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) at 11.52%. This indicates that NTLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
14.79%
11.52%
NTLA
FVRR

Financials

NTLA vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items