ABT vs. LEG
ABT (Abbott Laboratories) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ABT returned 10.97%/yr vs -12.01%/yr for LEG. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ABT vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than LEG's -10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 10.97%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -12.01% annualized return.
ABT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 15.48%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- -14.30%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.15B | $1.25B | $1.20B | |
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M |
ABT vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -14.07% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and LEG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
ABT:
$184.11B
LEG:
$1.34B
ABT:
$3.11
LEG:
$1.60
ABT:
34.03
LEG:
6.13
ABT:
3.96
LEG:
0.45
ABT:
2.82
LEG:
1.33
ABT:
$46.59B
LEG:
$3.03B
ABT:
$26.46B
LEG:
$717.40M
ABT:
$9.94B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABT vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
ABT
LEG
ABT vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABT | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.06 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.16 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 0.34 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABT vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABT | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -86.41% | +40.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.61% | -28.51% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -76.68% | +37.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.64% | -84.29% | +44.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.64% | -86.41% | +46.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.17% | -79.20% | +57.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -19.84% | +8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.16% | 13.72% | +6.44% |
Volatility
ABT vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) at 11.32%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABT | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 11.32% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 32.38% | -11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.55% | 49.36% | -22.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 42.74% | -19.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 39.96% | -16.01% |
Dividends
ABT vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than LEG's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
ABT vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABT and LEG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to LEG (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABT dropped -45.66% vs LEG's -86.41%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABT and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer