ABT vs. ITW
ABT (Abbott Laboratories) and ITW (Illinois Tool Works Inc.) are both stocks. ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while ITW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ABT returned 10.97%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for ITW. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ABT vs. ITW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than ITW's 17.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has underperformed ITW with an annualized return of 10.97%, while ITW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
ABT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 15.48%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- -14.30%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
ITW
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.15B | $1.25B | $1.20B | |
| $528.12M | $430.35M | $385.52M |
ABT vs. ITW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -14.07% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 17.95% | -0.43% | -0.97% | 21.56% | -8.46% | 23.60% | 16.42% | 45.60% | -22.10% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and ITW is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.32 |
The correlation between ABT and ITW shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABT:
$184.11B
ITW:
$82.56B
ABT:
$3.11
ITW:
$11.03
ABT:
34.03
ITW:
26.01
ABT:
2.12
ITW:
4.31
ABT:
3.96
ITW:
5.04
ABT:
2.82
ITW:
28.46
ABT:
$46.59B
ITW:
$16.47B
ABT:
$26.46B
ITW:
$7.27B
ABT:
$9.94B
ITW:
$4.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABT vs. ITW — Risk / Return Rank
ABT
ITW
ABT vs. ITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABT | ITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.14 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.86 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 1.76 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABT vs. ITW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum ITW drawdown of -54.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and ITW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABT | ITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -54.90% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.61% | -17.44% | -21.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -20.63% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.64% | -28.05% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.64% | -37.85% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.17% | -3.03% | -19.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -9.83% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.16% | 8.50% | +11.66% |
Volatility
ABT vs. ITW - Volatility Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) at 8.35%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABT | ITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 8.35% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 16.82% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.55% | 21.70% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 21.42% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 23.88% | +0.07% |
Dividends
ABT vs. ITW - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than ITW's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 2.24% | 2.53% | 2.29% | 2.07% | 2.30% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 2.81% | 1.71% | 1.96% | 2.23% |
Financials
ABT vs. ITW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Illinois Tool Works Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABT vs. ITW - Profitability Comparison
ABT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 7.30B and revenue of 12.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.
ITW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.1%.
ABT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
ITW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.
ABT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 928.00M and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
ITW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a net income of 815.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABT and ITW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to ITW (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABT dropped -45.66% vs ITW's -54.90%.
ITW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABT and ITW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer