PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABT vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABT vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -28.82% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 10.94%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.83% annualized return.


ABT

1D
-1.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
-28.82%
6M
-28.92%
1Y
-33.65%
3Y*
-2.76%
5Y*
-2.50%
10Y*
10.94%

AMZN

1D
-1.23%
1M
-10.73%
YTD
3.35%
6M
5.46%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
20.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABT vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-28.82%12.87%4.81%2.26%-20.68%30.53%28.04%22.08%29.06%52.03%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.35%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ABT and AMZN is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997

0.23

The correlation between ABT and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABT:

$154.05B

AMZN:

$2.59T

EPS

ABT:

$3.59

AMZN:

$8.37

PE Ratio

ABT:

24.57

AMZN:

28.50

PEG Ratio

ABT:

1.53

AMZN:

0.69

PS Ratio

ABT:

3.42

AMZN:

3.48

PB Ratio

ABT:

2.33

AMZN:

5.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABT:

$45.13B

AMZN:

$742.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABT:

$25.45B

AMZN:

$348.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABT:

$10.80B

AMZN:

$152.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABT vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABT vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABTAMZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.09

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.55

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.92

1.29

-3.21

ABT vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABT Sharpe Ratio is -1.40, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABT and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABT vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABTAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-94.40%

+48.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.99%

-21.74%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.64%

-30.88%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.64%

-56.15%

+16.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.64%

-56.15%

+16.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.53%

-13.25%

-22.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-28.19%

+17.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.75%

9.21%

+8.54%

Volatility

ABT vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) have volatilities of 7.71% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABTAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

7.92%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

20.73%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

30.13%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.06%

35.53%

-13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

32.48%

-8.81%

Dividends

ABT vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.77%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ABT vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
11.16B
181.52B
(ABT) Total Revenue
(AMZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABT vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abbott Laboratories and Amazon.com, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
56.3%
36.8%
Portfolio components
ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.28B and revenue of 11.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.

AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABT and AMZN have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZN has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to ABT (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABT dropped -45.66% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABT and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer