ABNY vs. CRF
ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both funds - ABNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past year, ABNY returned 1.04% vs 12.90% for CRF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.
Performance
ABNY vs. CRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.31% return.
ABNY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 1.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 12.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
ABNY vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 1.09% | -2.05% | -9.52% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -3.31% | 12.46% | 21.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNY and CRF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNY vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank
ABNY
CRF
ABNY vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNY | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.15 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.78 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 2.59 | -2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNY vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and CRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNY | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.62% | -80.70% | +49.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -14.88% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -5.09% | -9.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -22.31% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 4.48% | +4.53% |
Volatility
ABNY vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 4.16%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNY | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 4.16% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.17% | 13.41% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 15.41% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 25.07% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 25.86% | +4.14% |
ABNY vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNY vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison
ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.58%, more than CRF's 19.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.58% | 53.45% | 22.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.63% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNY and CRF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABNY has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to CRF (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs CRF's -80.70%.
CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNY and CRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer