CRF vs. AMDY
CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both funds - CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, CRF returned 14.77% vs 234.17% for AMDY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRF charges 1.84%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
CRF vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 103.59% return.
CRF
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 14.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
AMDY
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 35.49%
- YTD
- 103.59%
- 6M
- 107.20%
- 1Y
- 234.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRF vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -2.10% | 12.46% | 44.39% | -7.15% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 103.59% | 53.93% | -17.00% | 26.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRF and AMDY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRF vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
CRF
AMDY
CRF vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 4.42 | -3.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 4.47 | -3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.63 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 8.81 | -7.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 19.88 | -16.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 4.42 | -3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.21 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
CRF vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than AMDY's maximum drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.70% | -53.92% | -26.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -27.59% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | 0.00% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -18.04% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 12.22% | -7.82% |
Volatility
CRF vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) is 3.92%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 21.72%. This indicates that CRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 21.72% | -17.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 39.90% | -26.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 53.36% | -38.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 46.01% | -20.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 46.01% | -20.15% |
CRF vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRF has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRF vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.39%, less than AMDY's 56.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 56.77% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.39% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRF and AMDY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (21.72%) compared to CRF (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRF dropped -80.70% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRF and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer