PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLD vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABLD vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABLD vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
9.02%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.10%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 2.10% return.


ABLD

1D
2.85%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.21%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
10Y*

VFVA

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
2.10%
6M
6.23%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABLD vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABLD vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD
ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLDVFVADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.94

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.45

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.35

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.19

5.36

-1.17

ABLD vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and VFVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLDVFVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.94

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.39

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and VFVA is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ABLD vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than VFVA's 2.09% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
4.18%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.09%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and VFVA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLDVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-48.58%

+29.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.67%

-15.54%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-6.24%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-7.43%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.91%

-0.30%

Volatility

ABLD vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) at 4.33%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABLDVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

4.33%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

11.07%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.51%

22.24%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

20.25%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

24.51%

-6.93%