ABLD vs. ABXB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while ABXB is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABLD returned 12.75%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for ABXB. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for ABXB.

Performance

ABLD vs. ABXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than ABXB's 0.19% return.

ABLD

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABXB

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 6.41%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. ABXB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	8.60%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	0.19%	8.73%	4.69%	7.79%	-14.49%	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and ABXB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	0.39

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. ABXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 29
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ABXB

ABXB Risk / Return Rank: 41
ABXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ABXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ABXB Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ABXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABXB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. ABXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABLD	ABXB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.54	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.18	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.56	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	5.28	-0.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABLD vs. ABXB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the ABXB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and ABXB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABLD	ABXB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.54	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.24	+0.43

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. ABXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than ABXB's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and ABXB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	ABXB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-16.96%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-3.43%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-3.81%	-15.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.31%	-1.60%	-5.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-5.73%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	1.01%	+2.35%

Volatility

ABLD vs. ABXB - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) at 0.98%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABXB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	ABXB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	0.98%	+3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	2.74%	+10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	3.48%	+11.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.52%	5.59%	+11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	5.44%	+12.08%

ABLD vs. ABXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ABXB's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLD vs. ABXB - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than ABXB's 5.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.20%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	5.20%	5.50%	15.35%	4.79%	3.18%	3.40%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLD and ABXB in my portfolio?

ABLD and ABXB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLD or ABXB?

ABLD has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to ABXB (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs ABXB's -16.96%.

Which ETF is better, ABLD or ABXB?

On 3-year performance, ABLD leads with 12.75% vs 6.41% for ABXB. On fees, ABLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABXB has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLD or ABXB?

Over the 3-year period, ABLD has performed better with a 12.75% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLD or ABXB?

ABLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLD or ABXB?

ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.20% for ABLD.

What is the main difference between ABLD and ABXB?

ABLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ABXB is Nontraditional Bonds. ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while ABXB tracks Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLD and 0.62% for ABXB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.