ABXB vs. AMAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) and AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. ABXB is passively managed, while AMAX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABXB returned 6.52%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for AMAX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABXB charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for AMAX.

Performance

ABXB vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABXB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than AMAX's 4.98% return.

ABXB

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 6.52%
• 5Y*: 1.21%
• 10Y*: —

AMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABXB vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	0.50%	8.73%	4.69%	7.79%	-14.49%	0.86%
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	4.98%	11.38%	9.62%	6.70%	-12.56%	-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ABXB and AMAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.43

Return for Risk

ABXB vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABXB

ABXB Risk / Return Rank: 43
ABXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ABXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ABXB Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ABXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
ABXB Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABXB vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABXB	AMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.26	+0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.76	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.22	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.79	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	5.33	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABXB vs. AMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABXB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the AMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABXB and AMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABXB	AMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	1.26	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.39	-0.13

Drawdowns

ABXB vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABXB drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAX drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABXB and AMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABXB	AMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-16.28%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-7.53%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.81%	-9.27%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-1.80%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-5.32%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	2.53%	-1.52%

Volatility

ABXB vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) is 0.97%, while RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that ABXB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABXB	AMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	2.32%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	8.02%	-5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46%	9.95%	-6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	10.36%	-4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.44%	10.36%	-4.92%

ABXB vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABXB has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABXB vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison

ABXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than AMAX's 10.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	5.18%	5.50%	15.35%	4.79%	3.18%	3.40%	0.37%
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	10.94%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABXB and AMAX in my portfolio?

ABXB and AMAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABXB or AMAX?

AMAX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to ABXB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABXB dropped -16.96% vs AMAX's -16.28%.

Which ETF is better, ABXB or AMAX?

On 3-year performance, AMAX leads with 9.23% vs 6.52% for ABXB. On fees, ABXB is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, ABXB has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABXB or AMAX?

Over the 3-year period, AMAX has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABXB or AMAX?

ABXB is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABXB or AMAX?

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 5.18% for ABXB.

What is the main difference between ABXB and AMAX?

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for ABXB and 1.29% for AMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.