ABXB vs. JFLX
ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) and JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. ABXB is passively managed, while JFLX is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABXB charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JFLX.
Performance
ABXB vs. JFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABXB achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than JFLX's 2.17% return.
ABXB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
JFLX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABXB vs. JFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 0.33% | 1.65% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 2.17% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABXB and JFLX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABXB vs. JFLX — Risk / Return Rank
ABXB
JFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABXB vs. JFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) and JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABXB vs. JFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABXB drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than JFLX's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABXB and JFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -2.36% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.22% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -0.38% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility
ABXB vs. JFLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 2.67% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 2.67% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 2.67% | +2.77% |
ABXB vs. JFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABXB has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABXB vs. JFLX - Dividend Comparison
ABXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than JFLX's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 5.19% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.27% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABXB and JFLX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.
ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.27% for JFLX.
They also come from different issuers: Abacus and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for ABXB and 0.45% for JFLX.
Find the right allocation for ABXB and JFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer