ABXB vs. JFLX
ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) and JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. ABXB is passively managed, while JFLX is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABXB charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JFLX.
Performance
ABXB vs. JFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABXB achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than JFLX's 1.82% return.
ABXB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
JFLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABXB vs. JFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 0.19% | 1.42% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 1.82% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABXB and JFLX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABXB vs. JFLX — Risk / Return Rank
ABXB
JFLX
ABXB vs. JFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) and JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.79 | -1.55 |
Drawdowns
ABXB vs. JFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABXB drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than JFLX's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABXB and JFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -2.36% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.14% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -0.40% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
ABXB vs. JFLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABXB | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 2.59% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 2.59% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 2.59% | +2.85% |
ABXB vs. JFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABXB has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABXB vs. JFLX - Dividend Comparison
ABXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than JFLX's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 5.20% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.28% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABXB and JFLX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.
ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 3.28% for JFLX.
They also come from different issuers: Abacus and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for ABXB and 0.45% for JFLX.
Find the right allocation for ABXB and JFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer