PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABHY vs. ABLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABHY vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABHY vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
-0.88%8.73%4.69%7.79%-14.49%0.86%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
9.02%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than ABLD's 9.02% return.


ABHY

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
0.55%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*

ABLD

1D
2.85%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.21%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABHY vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABHY vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABHY
ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ABLD
ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABHY vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABHYABLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

0.80

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

1.18

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

1.03

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.47

4.19

+5.29

ABHY vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABHY and ABLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABHYABLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.80

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.71

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between ABHY and ABLD is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ABHY vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than ABLD's 4.18% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
5.25%5.50%15.35%4.79%3.18%3.40%0.37%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
4.18%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABHY vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum ABLD drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and ABLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABHYABLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-19.35%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-14.67%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-6.95%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-3.91%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

3.61%

-2.87%

Volatility

ABHY vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 2.07%, while Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABHYABLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

7.45%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

11.80%

-9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

18.51%

-14.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.58%

17.58%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

17.58%

-12.08%