PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABHY vs. AMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABHY vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than AMAX's 4.98% return.


ABHY

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.87%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*

AMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.30%
YTD
4.98%
6M
3.96%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABHY vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
0.50%8.73%4.69%7.79%-14.49%0.86%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.98%11.38%9.62%6.70%-12.56%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ABHY and AMAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABHY vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABHY
ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABHY vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABHYAMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.26

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

1.76

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.79

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.73

5.33

+0.40

ABHY vs. AMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the AMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABHY and AMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABHYAMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.26

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.39

-0.13

Drawdowns

ABHY vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAX drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and AMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABHYAMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-16.28%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-7.53%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.81%

-9.27%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.80%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-5.32%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.53%

-1.52%

Volatility

ABHY vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 0.97%, while RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABHYAMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

2.32%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

8.02%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

9.95%

-6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

10.36%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

10.36%

-4.92%

ABHY vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABHY vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison

ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than AMAX's 10.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
5.18%5.50%15.35%4.79%3.18%3.40%0.37%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.94%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABHY and AMAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to ABHY (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABHY dropped -16.96% vs AMAX's -16.28%.

On 3-year performance, AMAX leads with 9.23% vs 6.52% for ABHY. On fees, ABHY is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ABHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMAX has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABHY is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 5.18% for ABHY.

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ABHY and 1.29% for AMAX.

ABHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABHY and AMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer