PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABHY vs. ABLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABHY vs. ABLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABHY vs. ABLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
-0.78%8.73%4.69%7.79%-14.49%1.30%0.87%
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
-3.95%13.27%0.39%18.22%-24.37%16.87%3.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than ABLG's -3.95% return.


ABHY

1D
0.10%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
0.51%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

ABLG

1D
2.32%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABHY vs. ABLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLG's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABHY vs. ABLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABHY
ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ABLG
ABLG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ABLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABHY vs. ABLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABHYABLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.46

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

0.75

+1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.11

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.65

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.21

2.56

+6.64

ABHY vs. ABLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the ABLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABHY and ABLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABHYABLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.46

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.10

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.25

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between ABHY and ABLG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABHY vs. ABLG - Dividend Comparison

ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than ABLG's 2.65% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
5.25%5.50%15.35%4.79%3.18%3.40%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
2.65%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%

Drawdowns

ABHY vs. ABLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum ABLG drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and ABLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABHYABLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-34.17%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-14.24%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-34.13%

+17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-8.21%

+5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-9.33%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

3.63%

-2.87%

Volatility

ABHY vs. ABLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 2.06%, while Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABHYABLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

7.95%

-5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

12.27%

-9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

19.70%

-15.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.58%

16.60%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

18.82%

-13.32%