ABEQ vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABEQ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Absolute Investment Advisers LLC, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. ABEQ is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, ABEQ returned 10.41% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

ABEQ

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 4.69%
• 6M: 3.56%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	4.69%	9.56%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and RBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 30
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABEQ	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	4.35	-3.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	6.69	-5.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.13	-0.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	7.82	-6.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	42.95	-40.02

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEQ	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.82%	-0.52%	-27.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-0.52%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.31%	-0.50%	-5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-0.07%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	0.10%	+3.45%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ABEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEQ	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	0.36%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.48%	0.85%	+5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.95%	0.95%	+8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	1.07%	+9.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.80%	1.07%	+12.73%

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABEQ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.19%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEQ and RBIL in my portfolio?

ABEQ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABEQ or RBIL?

ABEQ has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, ABEQ or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, ABEQ leads with 10.41% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABEQ or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, ABEQ has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABEQ or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABEQ or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.19% for ABEQ.

What is the main difference between ABEQ and RBIL?

ABEQ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.