ABEQ vs. KWIN
ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ABEQ is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.72% return.
ABEQ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 4.41% | 4.38% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.72% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEQ and KWIN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABEQ vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
ABEQ
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABEQ | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEQ | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -1.50% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -1.32% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -0.26% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABEQ | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 4.15% | +4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.80% | 4.15% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 4.15% | +9.63% |
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABEQ vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABEQ and KWIN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for ABEQ and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer