ABEQ vs. CDC
Compare and contrast key facts about Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC).
ABEQ and CDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABEQ is an actively managed fund by Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. It was launched on Jan 22, 2020. CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014.
Performance
ABEQ vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABEQ vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 5.30% | 15.32% | 12.68% | 4.63% | -1.00% | 12.49% | 2.51% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 9.03% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 33.05% | 12.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 9.03% return.
ABEQ
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 12.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABEQ vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABEQ vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
ABEQ
CDC
ABEQ vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABEQ | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.23 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 4.90 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABEQ | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.74 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEQ and CDC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ABEQ vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than CDC's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.19% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
ABEQ vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and CDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEQ | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -21.37% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -11.27% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -21.37% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -3.07% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -5.14% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.84% | -0.73% |
Volatility
ABEQ vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.82%, while VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABEQ | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.97% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 7.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 13.63% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 12.56% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 13.22% | +0.77% |