PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABDN.L vs. IMBBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ABDN.L is traded in GBp, while IMBBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMBBY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABDN.L achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than IMBBY's -10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L has outperformed IMBBY with an annualized return of 4.43%, while IMBBY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.99% annualized return.


ABDN.L

1D
-3.16%
1M
15.11%
YTD
20.60%
6M
22.50%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
4.43%

IMBBY

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-10.71%
6M
-14.66%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
20.60%57.94%-12.84%2.11%-14.88%-9.77%-5.36%38.83%-37.07%23.74%
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
-10.71%29.01%50.14%-4.49%36.61%15.22%-8.95%-14.05%-18.87%-6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ABDN.L and IMBBY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.12

The correlation between ABDN.L and IMBBY shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ABDN.L:

£0.70

IMBBY:

$5.30

PE Ratio

ABDN.L:

3.43

IMBBY:

6.86

PEG Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.00

IMBBY:

2.75

PS Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.68

IMBBY:

0.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.20B

IMBBY:

$38.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.05B

IMBBY:

$13.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£796.00M

IMBBY:

$8.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABDN.L
ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IMBBY
IMBBY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IMBBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMBBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMBBY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IMBBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMBBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABDN.LIMBBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.05

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

0.14

+8.46

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the IMBBY Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABDN.L and IMBBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABDN.LIMBBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.05

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.98

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.17

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.20

-0.03

Drawdowns

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABDN.L drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, roughly equal to the maximum IMBBY drawdown of -60.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABDN.L and IMBBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABDN.LIMBBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-60.06%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-18.26%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.10%

-18.26%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.49%

-21.86%

-28.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.34%

-60.06%

+3.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-17.30%

+13.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-24.04%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

7.08%

-2.05%

Volatility

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) at 7.52%. This indicates that ABDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMBBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABDN.LIMBBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

7.52%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

15.90%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

20.23%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.43%

19.10%

+13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.10%

22.95%

+11.15%

Dividends

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Dividend Comparison

ABDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than IMBBY's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
6.10%7.10%10.34%8.17%7.71%6.06%7.68%6.58%22.85%4.66%5.06%17.89%
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
5.98%5.37%6.04%7.62%7.03%8.58%9.92%10.41%7.93%5.03%4.54%0.00%

Financials

ABDN.L vs. IMBBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn plc and Imperial Brands PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B202120222023202420252026
1.04B
9.22B
(ABDN.L) Total Revenue
(IMBBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ABDN.L values in GBp, IMBBY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ABDN.L and IMBBY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABDN.L and IMBBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer