PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMBBY vs. MO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IMBBYMO
YTD Return34.88%45.89%
1Y Return41.74%49.78%
3Y Return (Ann)20.87%16.44%
5Y Return (Ann)15.41%11.62%
10Y Return (Ann)3.05%7.86%
Sharpe Ratio2.502.84
Sortino Ratio3.424.05
Omega Ratio1.461.56
Calmar Ratio1.492.58
Martin Ratio11.1615.99
Ulcer Index4.00%3.17%
Daily Std Dev17.90%17.82%
Max Drawdown-65.18%-82.48%
Current Drawdown-3.54%0.00%

Fundamentals


IMBBYMO
Market Cap$25.48B$91.40B
EPS$2.96$5.92
PE Ratio10.159.11
PEG Ratio16.614.31

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between IMBBY and MO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IMBBY vs. MO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a 34.88% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 45.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBBY has underperformed MO with an annualized return of 3.05%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.11%
25.56%
IMBBY
MO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMBBY vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMBBY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 11.16, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.16
MO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MO, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MO, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MO, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MO, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MO, currently valued at 15.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.99

IMBBY vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMBBY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the MO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBBY and MO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.50
2.84
IMBBY
MO

Dividends

IMBBY vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than MO's 7.17% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
6.25%7.61%7.03%8.61%9.98%10.46%7.98%4.86%4.77%5.37%4.45%4.47%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
7.17%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%4.06%4.79%

Drawdowns

IMBBY vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, smaller than the maximum MO drawdown of -82.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and MO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.54%
0
IMBBY
MO

Volatility

IMBBY vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) is 5.71%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that IMBBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.71%
8.52%
IMBBY
MO

Financials

IMBBY vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands PLC and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items