PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMBBY vs. MO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMBBY and MO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

IMBBY vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
27.81%
7.69%
IMBBY
MO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMBBY:

3.13

MO:

2.63

Sortino Ratio

IMBBY:

4.21

MO:

3.75

Omega Ratio

IMBBY:

1.57

MO:

1.49

Calmar Ratio

IMBBY:

1.90

MO:

2.50

Martin Ratio

IMBBY:

19.77

MO:

10.88

Ulcer Index

IMBBY:

2.89%

MO:

4.30%

Daily Std Dev

IMBBY:

18.25%

MO:

17.87%

Max Drawdown

IMBBY:

-65.18%

MO:

-57.38%

Current Drawdown

IMBBY:

-1.91%

MO:

-4.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMBBY:

$29.12B

MO:

$90.18B

EPS

IMBBY:

$3.77

MO:

$6.54

PE Ratio

IMBBY:

9.28

MO:

8.16

PEG Ratio

IMBBY:

1.50

MO:

3.81

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than MO's 3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBBY has underperformed MO with an annualized return of 3.83%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.39% annualized return.


IMBBY

YTD

10.70%

1M

10.15%

6M

29.89%

1Y

60.11%

5Y*

17.86%

10Y*

3.83%

MO

YTD

3.90%

1M

5.56%

6M

8.96%

1Y

45.78%

5Y*

12.31%

10Y*

6.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMBBY vs. MO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMBBY is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MO is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MO is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MO is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MO is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MO is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MO is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMBBY vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.003.132.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 4.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.213.75
The chart of Omega ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.571.49
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.902.50
The chart of Martin ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 19.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0019.7710.88
IMBBY
MO

The current IMBBY Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the MO Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBBY and MO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.13
2.63
IMBBY
MO

Dividends

IMBBY vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than MO's 7.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
3.59%6.04%7.61%7.03%8.61%9.98%10.46%7.98%4.86%4.77%5.37%4.45%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
7.36%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%4.06%

Drawdowns

IMBBY vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -57.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and MO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.91%
-4.08%
IMBBY
MO

Volatility

IMBBY vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) is 4.65%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that IMBBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.65%
5.91%
IMBBY
MO

Financials

IMBBY vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands PLC and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab