IMBBY vs. HUM
Compare and contrast key facts about Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Humana Inc. (HUM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMBBY or HUM.
Key characteristics
| IMBBY | HUM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.38% | -23.98% |
| 1Y Return | 19.51% | -32.47% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.10% | -7.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.27% | 7.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.13% | 12.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | -1.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.94% | 32.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.18% | -86.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.27% | -37.62% |
Fundamentals
| IMBBY | HUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20.39B | $40.44B |
| EPS | $3.13 | $16.24 |
| PE Ratio | 7.55 | 20.66 |
| PEG Ratio | 16.79 | 1.64 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.08B | $109.24B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $6.04B | $17.18B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.75B | $4.47B |
Correlation
The correlation between IMBBY and HUM is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IMBBY vs. HUM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than HUM's -23.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBBY has underperformed HUM with an annualized return of 1.13%, while HUM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMBBY vs. HUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Humana Inc. (HUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMBBY vs. HUM - Dividend Comparison
IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than HUM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMBBY Imperial Brands PLC | 7.31% | 7.61% | 7.03% | 8.61% | 9.98% | 10.46% | 7.98% | 4.86% | 4.77% | 5.37% | 4.45% | 4.47% |
HUM Humana Inc. | 1.02% | 0.77% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
IMBBY vs. HUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, smaller than the maximum HUM drawdown of -86.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and HUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMBBY vs. HUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) is 5.96%, while Humana Inc. (HUM) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that IMBBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IMBBY vs. HUM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands PLC and Humana Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities