ABDN.L vs. EMG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Man Group plc (EMG.L).
Performance
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | -1.64% | 57.94% | -12.84% | 2.11% | -14.88% | -9.77% | -5.36% | 38.83% | -37.07% | 23.74% |
EMG.L Man Group plc | 12.06% | 15.64% | -2.97% | 15.39% | -1.55% | 72.22% | -7.02% | 25.52% | -32.33% | 83.45% |
Fundamentals
ABDN.L:
£0.70
EMG.L:
£0.41
ABDN.L:
2.80
EMG.L:
6.22
ABDN.L:
0.56
EMG.L:
1.03
ABDN.L:
£3.20B
EMG.L:
£2.87B
ABDN.L:
£3.05B
EMG.L:
£1.83B
ABDN.L:
£796.00M
EMG.L:
£808.12M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABDN.L achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than EMG.L's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L has underperformed EMG.L with an annualized return of 2.01%, while EMG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.
ABDN.L
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 37.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
EMG.L
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 40.34%
- 1Y
- 42.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ABDN.L
EMG.L
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Man Group plc (EMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABDN.L | EMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.06 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.65 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 9.22 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABDN.L | EMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.55 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.38 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABDN.L and EMG.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Dividend Comparison
ABDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than EMG.L's 5.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | 7.48% | 7.10% | 10.34% | 8.17% | 7.71% | 6.06% | 7.68% | 6.58% | 22.85% | 4.66% | 5.06% | 17.89% |
EMG.L Man Group plc | 5.04% | 5.65% | 5.97% | 5.37% | 5.35% | 3.59% | 5.65% | 5.02% | 6.81% | 3.58% | 5.77% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABDN.L drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum EMG.L drawdown of -85.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABDN.L and EMG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABDN.L | EMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -85.43% | +25.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -13.44% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.49% | -37.90% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.34% | -50.75% | -5.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.11% | -8.03% | -6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.13% | -29.06% | +5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 5.32% | -0.49% |
Volatility
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Man Group plc (EMG.L) have volatilities of 9.91% and 9.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABDN.L | EMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 9.93% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.99% | 20.30% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 28.99% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 29.09% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.00% | 29.71% | +4.29% |
Financials
ABDN.L vs. EMG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn plc and Man Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities