PortfoliosLab logo
IMBBY vs. TSLA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMBBY and TSLA is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMBBY:

3.04

TSLA:

1.31

Sortino Ratio

IMBBY:

3.60

TSLA:

2.10

Omega Ratio

IMBBY:

1.54

TSLA:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

IMBBY:

3.20

TSLA:

1.64

Martin Ratio

IMBBY:

18.50

TSLA:

3.87

Ulcer Index

IMBBY:

3.36%

TSLA:

24.80%

Daily Std Dev

IMBBY:

20.77%

TSLA:

72.42%

Max Drawdown

IMBBY:

-65.18%

TSLA:

-73.63%

Current Drawdown

IMBBY:

-10.18%

TSLA:

-27.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMBBY:

$31.04B

TSLA:

$1.15T

EPS

IMBBY:

$4.02

TSLA:

$1.70

PE Ratio

IMBBY:

9.44

TSLA:

203.80

PEG Ratio

IMBBY:

0.91

TSLA:

5.72

PS Ratio

IMBBY:

1.68

TSLA:

12.06

PB Ratio

IMBBY:

4.65

TSLA:

15.46

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBBY has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 4.54%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.


IMBBY

YTD

20.75%

1M

-7.05%

6M

18.53%

1Y

60.33%

3Y*

26.74%

5Y*

24.72%

10Y*

4.54%

TSLA

YTD

-14.21%

1M

23.51%

6M

0.38%

1Y

94.55%

3Y*

11.08%

5Y*

44.15%

10Y*

35.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Imperial Brands PLC

Tesla, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMBBY vs. TSLA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TSLA is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TSLA is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TSLA is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TSLA is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TSLA is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TSLA is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IMBBY Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBBY and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
4.39%6.04%7.61%7.03%8.61%9.98%10.46%7.98%4.86%4.77%5.37%4.45%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and TSLA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) is 10.84%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that IMBBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

IMBBY vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands PLC and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
19.34B
(IMBBY) Total Revenue
(TSLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items