PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AB vs. LAZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AB vs. LAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AB vs. LAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-0.36%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
-11.74%-1.64%54.83%6.92%-16.21%7.41%12.08%15.22%-25.38%36.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AB:

$3.39B

LAZ:

$4.57B

EPS

AB:

$2.89

LAZ:

$2.23

PE Ratio

AB:

12.98

LAZ:

19.04

PS Ratio

AB:

11.69

LAZ:

1.42

PB Ratio

AB:

2.88

LAZ:

5.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

AB:

$332.76M

LAZ:

$3.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AB:

$332.76M

LAZ:

$1.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

AB:

$243.00M

LAZ:

$418.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than LAZ's -11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed LAZ with an annualized return of 13.83%, while LAZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


AB

1D
2.69%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
2.51%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
13.83%

LAZ

1D
5.33%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
-11.74%
6M
-17.96%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AB vs. LAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LAZ
LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AB vs. LAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLAZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.05

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

0.38

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.08

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.99

0.20

+0.78

AB vs. LAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the LAZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AB and LAZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLAZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.05

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.11

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.17

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.17

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between AB and LAZ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AB vs. LAZ - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, more than LAZ's 4.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.03%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.71%4.12%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%5.88%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%

Drawdowns

AB vs. LAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than LAZ's maximum drawdown of -62.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and LAZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLAZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.65%

-62.72%

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-31.39%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

-44.24%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-59.51%

+1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.42%

-26.12%

+15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.30%

-23.52%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

12.47%

-6.30%

Volatility

AB vs. LAZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 7.70%, while Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABLAZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

14.87%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

26.91%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.61%

44.41%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.50%

36.35%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

35.87%

-3.41%

Financials

AB vs. LAZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Lazard Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
89.76M
938.59M
(AB) Total Revenue
(LAZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AB vs. LAZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Lazard Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
100.0%
26.9%
Portfolio components
AB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a gross profit of 89.76M and revenue of 89.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 252.59M and revenue of 938.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

AB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported an operating income of 89.76M and revenue of 89.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 84.95M and revenue of 938.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

AB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a net income of 81.80M and revenue of 89.76M, resulting in a net margin of 91.1%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 49.86M and revenue of 938.59M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.