PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AB vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 14.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


AB

1D
-0.50%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-3.65%
1Y
-2.34%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
14.22%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-2.75%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AB and VOO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between AB and VOO has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.35

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

2.67

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

11.96

-12.29

AB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.65%

-33.99%

-53.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-8.90%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-18.69%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

-24.52%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-33.99%

-24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-3.14%

-9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.19%

-3.68%

-22.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

1.99%

+5.04%

Volatility

AB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 3.69%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.83%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.88%

9.82%

+8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

12.46%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.19%

16.91%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.38%

18.02%

+14.36%

Dividends

AB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.53%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


AB and VOO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to AB (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AB and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer