PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AB vs. UTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ABUTF
YTD Return10.48%9.14%
1Y Return2.59%4.55%
3Y Return (Ann)0.22%-0.86%
5Y Return (Ann)11.89%6.13%
10Y Return (Ann)11.71%8.39%
Sharpe Ratio0.040.25
Daily Std Dev24.86%20.19%
Max Drawdown-87.65%-72.63%
Current Drawdown-28.70%-9.94%

Fundamentals


ABUTF
Market Cap$3.78B$2.67B
EPS$2.34$18.14
PE Ratio14.1212.37
PEG Ratio1.380.00
Revenue (TTM)$299.78M$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM)$305.50M$0.00

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between AB and UTF is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AB vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 11.71%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
21.40%
26.42%
AB
UTF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AB vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AB, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AB, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AB, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AB, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AB, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.11
UTF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UTF, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UTF, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UTF, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UTF, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UTF, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.66

AB vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AB and UTF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.04
0.25
AB
UTF

Dividends

AB vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, less than UTF's 8.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%7.32%7.45%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
8.25%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%6.99%

Drawdowns

AB vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-28.70%
-9.94%
AB
UTF

Volatility

AB vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) have volatilities of 6.55% and 6.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.55%
6.31%
AB
UTF

Financials

AB vs. UTF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items