AB vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AB or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between AB and UTF is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AB vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AB:
1.24
UTF:
1.06
AB:
1.83
UTF:
1.54
AB:
1.25
UTF:
1.23
AB:
1.23
UTF:
1.55
AB:
8.19
UTF:
4.45
AB:
4.47%
UTF:
4.18%
AB:
28.66%
UTF:
16.22%
AB:
-87.65%
UTF:
-72.62%
AB:
-2.96%
UTF:
-0.48%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 12.16%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.71% annualized return.
AB
15.31%
11.23%
16.50%
36.87%
23.79%
12.16%
UTF
9.26%
8.57%
4.32%
16.92%
12.41%
9.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AB vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AB
UTF
AB vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AB vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than UTF's 7.27% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 8.17% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% | 7.32% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.27% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
AB vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
AB vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.17%. This indicates that AB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AB vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities