AB vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AB or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between AB and UTF is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AB vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AB:
1.24
UTF:
1.62
AB:
1.80
UTF:
2.38
AB:
1.22
UTF:
1.28
AB:
0.88
UTF:
1.32
AB:
8.60
UTF:
6.91
AB:
3.31%
UTF:
3.49%
AB:
23.00%
UTF:
14.86%
AB:
-87.65%
UTF:
-72.62%
AB:
-13.10%
UTF:
-5.63%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 13.04%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.
AB
3.26%
2.79%
16.33%
24.47%
12.05%
13.04%
UTF
2.30%
5.05%
5.07%
25.80%
5.73%
9.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AB vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AB
UTF
AB vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AB vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than UTF's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 7.78% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% | 7.32% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.61% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
AB vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AB vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.75%. This indicates that AB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AB vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities