AB vs. GT
AB (AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.) and GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) are both stocks. AB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while GT operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AB returned 14.19%/yr vs -12.14%/yr for GT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AB vs. GT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -24.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 14.19%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -12.14% annualized return.
AB
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- -1.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
GT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- 6M
- -27.43%
- YTD
- -24.20%
- 1Y
- -40.66%
- 3Y*
- -23.96%
- 5Y*
- -16.67%
- 10Y*
- -12.14%
AB vs. GT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 1.52% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 19.85% | 21.04% | 16.76% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -24.20% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.05% | -20.86% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AB and GT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1988 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AB and GT has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AB:
$4.13B
GT:
$1.91B
AB:
$3.38
GT:
-$10.82
AB:
13.74
GT:
0.07
AB:
$250.00M
GT:
$17.91B
AB:
$250.00M
GT:
$2.63B
AB:
$252.50M
GT:
$832.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AB vs. GT — Risk / Return Rank
AB
GT
AB vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.85 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.79 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -1.21 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AB vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and GT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.65% | -94.50% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -51.65% | +36.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -65.34% | +44.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.76% | -76.88% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.08% | -86.55% | +28.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -88.31% | +79.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -48.77% | +22.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 33.62% | -26.11% |
Volatility
AB vs. GT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 5.44%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 17.53% | -12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | 35.43% | -17.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 47.05% | -24.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 51.33% | -23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 49.01% | -16.68% |
Dividends
AB vs. GT - Dividend Comparison
AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 9.13% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Financials
AB vs. GT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AB and GT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GT has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to AB (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs GT's -94.50%.
AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AB and GT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer