AB vs. GT
AB (AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.) and GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) are both stocks. AB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while GT operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AB returned 14.60%/yr vs -12.10%/yr for GT. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AB vs. GT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 14.60%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -12.10% annualized return.
AB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- -1.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.66%
GT
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- 6M
- -26.14%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 1Y
- -31.12%
- 3Y*
- -24.27%
- 5Y*
- -15.05%
- 10Y*
- -12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.20M | $8.80M | $11.34M | |
| $55.08M | $73.99M | $64.15M |
AB vs. GT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | -0.09% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 19.85% | 21.04% | 16.76% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -20.66% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.05% | -20.86% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AB and GT is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1988 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AB and GT has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AB:
$3.43B
GT:
$2.00B
AB:
$3.39
GT:
-$10.82
AB:
9.88
GT:
0.07
AB:
$343.43M
GT:
$17.91B
AB:
$343.43M
GT:
$2.63B
AB:
$343.43M
GT:
$832.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AB vs. GT — Risk / Return Rank
AB
GT
AB vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.90 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.69 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | -1.14 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AB vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and GT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.65% | -94.50% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -47.06% | +32.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -62.80% | +43.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.76% | -76.88% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.08% | -86.55% | +28.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -87.76% | +77.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.15% | -48.80% | +22.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 28.48% | -21.17% |
Volatility
AB vs. GT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 4.49%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AB | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 14.95% | -10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 36.26% | -20.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 47.47% | -25.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 51.38% | -23.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 49.06% | -16.75% |
Dividends
AB vs. GT - Dividend Comparison
AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 9.28% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Financials
AB vs. GT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AB vs. GT - Profitability Comparison
AB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a gross profit of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported an operating income of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a net income of 71.72M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in a net margin of 89.7%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AB and GT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GT has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to AB (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs GT's -94.50%.
AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AB and GT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer