PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AB vs. GT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ABGT
YTD Return32.02%-31.35%
1Y Return47.84%-22.90%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.16%-24.82%
5Y Return (Ann)14.40%-10.28%
10Y Return (Ann)12.82%-8.07%
Sharpe Ratio2.10-0.54
Sortino Ratio2.83-0.51
Omega Ratio1.350.93
Calmar Ratio1.04-0.27
Martin Ratio17.40-0.88
Ulcer Index2.72%26.93%
Daily Std Dev22.50%44.09%
Max Drawdown-87.65%-94.50%
Current Drawdown-14.80%-82.65%

Fundamentals


ABGT
Market Cap$4.33B$2.71B
EPS$3.48-$1.07
PEG Ratio0.681.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$433.88M$14.22B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$1.38B$2.82B
EBITDA (TTM)$816.07M$1.40B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between AB and GT is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AB vs. GT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a 32.02% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -31.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 12.82%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -8.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.61%
-24.50%
AB
GT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AB vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AB, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AB, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AB, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AB, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AB, currently valued at 17.40, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0017.40
GT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GT, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.88, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.88

AB vs. GT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the GT Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AB and GT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.10
-0.54
AB
GT

Dividends

AB vs. GT - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
7.94%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%7.32%7.45%
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%0.21%

Drawdowns

AB vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.80%
-82.65%
AB
GT

Volatility

AB vs. GT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 7.72%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 17.36%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.72%
17.36%
AB
GT

Financials

AB vs. GT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items