AAXJ vs. VOO
AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ returned 10.50%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
AAXJ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 31.17% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.50%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
AAXJ
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 31.17%
- 6M
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 59.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
AAXJ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 31.17% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | -20.35% | -5.73% | 23.35% | 17.93% | -15.04% | 41.76% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAXJ and VOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AAXJ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
AAXJ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAXJ
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AAXJ
VOO
Financial Services
AAXJ
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
AAXJ
VOO
Industrials
AAXJ
VOO
Communication Services
AAXJ
VOO
Basic Materials
AAXJ
VOO
Healthcare
AAXJ
VOO
Energy
AAXJ
VOO
Consumer Defensive
AAXJ
VOO
Utilities
AAXJ
VOO
Real Estate
AAXJ
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAXJ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
AAXJ
VOO
AAXJ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAXJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.43 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 3.16 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 14.73 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAXJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 2.39 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.83 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.87 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.89 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
AAXJ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAXJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -33.99% | -15.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -8.90% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -18.69% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.74% | -24.52% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.52% | -33.99% | -10.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.70% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -3.69% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 1.91% | +1.62% |
Volatility
AAXJ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAXJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 2.84% | +6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 8.90% | +8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 11.80% | +8.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 16.81% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 18.01% | +2.24% |
AAXJ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAXJ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.38% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAXJ and VOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAXJ has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 10.50% for AAXJ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.
AAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.03% for VOO.
AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAXJ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer