AAUC vs. GFI
AAUC (Allied Gold Corp) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, AAUC returned 69.51% vs 42.17% for GFI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AAUC vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUC achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -22.64% return.
AAUC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 69.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFI
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -20.24%
- YTD
- -22.64%
- 6M
- -26.59%
- 1Y
- 42.17%
- 3Y*
- 36.61%
- 5Y*
- 33.83%
- 10Y*
- 24.85%
AAUC vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUC Allied Gold Corp | -0.13% | 52.69% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -22.64% | 79.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUC and GFI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between AAUC and GFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
AAUC:
$2.63B
GFI:
$29.35B
AAUC:
-$0.45
GFI:
$5.39
AAUC:
1.97
GFI:
2.10
AAUC:
6.46
GFI:
3.48
AAUC:
$1.33B
GFI:
$13.98B
AAUC:
$506.54M
GFI:
$7.34B
AAUC:
$320.85M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUC vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
AAUC
GFI
AAUC vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.91 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 2.37 | +4.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUC vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUC and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -88.05% | +59.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.62% | -46.66% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.62% | -45.09% | +16.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -44.24% | +36.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.92% | 17.87% | -7.95% |
Volatility
AAUC vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) is 12.31%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that AAUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | 20.41% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.09% | 48.15% | -25.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.88% | 61.46% | -15.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 52.73% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 54.92% | -8.88% |
Dividends
AAUC vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
AAUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUC Allied Gold Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.61% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
AAUC vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Gold Corp and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAUC vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
AAUC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a gross profit of 190.40M and revenue of 427.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.5%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
AAUC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported an operating income of 138.10M and revenue of 427.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
AAUC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a net income of -23.64M and revenue of 427.82M, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUC and GFI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to AAUC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUC dropped -28.62% vs GFI's -88.05%.
AAUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAUC and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer