AAUC vs. CDE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AAUC (Allied Gold Corp) and CDE (Coeur Mining, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, AAUC returned 69.51% vs 81.09% for CDE. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AAUC vs. CDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) and Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUC achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than CDE's -10.22% return.

AAUC

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -17.27%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: -6.58%
• 1Y: 69.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CDE

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: -12.96%
• YTD: -10.22%
• 6M: -14.49%
• 1Y: 81.09%
• 3Y*: 76.53%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUC vs. CDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAUC Allied Gold Corp	-0.13%	52.69%
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc.	-10.22%	90.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUC and CDE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.50

Fundamentals

EPS AAUC : -$0.45 CDE : $1.64
PS Ratio AAUC : 1.97 CDE : 3.03
Total Revenue (TTM) AAUC : $1.33B CDE : $2.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) AAUC : $506.54M CDE : $909.07M
EBITDA (TTM) AAUC : $320.85M CDE : $1.23B

Return for Risk

AAUC vs. CDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUC

AAUC Risk / Return Rank: 81
AAUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AAUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AAUC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AAUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AAUC Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CDE

CDE Risk / Return Rank: 74
CDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CDE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CDE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUC vs. CDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) and Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAUC	CDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.13	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.74	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	1.89	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.03	3.59	+3.44

AAUC vs. CDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUC and CDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAUC vs. CDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum CDE drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUC and CDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUC	CDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.62%	-99.40%	+70.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.62%	-43.18%	+14.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-77.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.62%	-94.45%	+65.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-81.50%	+73.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.92%	22.67%	-12.75%

Volatility

AAUC vs. CDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) is 12.31%, while Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) has a volatility of 23.23%. This indicates that AAUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAUC	CDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.31%	23.23%	-10.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.09%	55.75%	-32.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.88%	72.29%	-26.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.04%	68.55%	-22.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.04%	68.92%	-22.88%

Dividends

AAUC vs. CDE - Dividend Comparison

AAUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM
AAUC Allied Gold Corp	0.00%
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc.	0.13%

Financials

AAUC vs. CDE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allied Gold Corp and Coeur Mining, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AAUC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a gross profit of 190.40M and revenue of 427.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.5%.

CDE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 856.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAUC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported an operating income of 138.10M and revenue of 427.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

CDE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported an operating income of 349.17M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.8%.

AAUC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a net income of -23.64M and revenue of 427.82M, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.

CDE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a net income of 246.76M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUC and CDE in my portfolio?

AAUC and CDE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAUC or CDE?

CDE has higher volatility (23.23%) compared to AAUC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUC dropped -28.62% vs CDE's -99.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.