AAUC vs. WPM
Compare and contrast key facts about Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM).
Performance
AAUC vs. WPM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAUC vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUC Allied Gold Corp | 36.41% | 51.63% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 16.59% | 32.30% |
Fundamentals
AAUC:
$3.61B
WPM:
$62.22B
AAUC:
-$0.34
WPM:
$3.26
AAUC:
3.33
WPM:
26.72
AAUC:
10.90
WPM:
7.17
AAUC:
$1.07B
WPM:
$2.33B
AAUC:
$383.36M
WPM:
$1.75B
AAUC:
$213.61M
WPM:
$2.02B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUC achieves a 36.41% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's 16.59% return.
AAUC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 36.41%
- 6M
- 77.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WPM
- 1D
- 4.42%
- 1M
- -17.32%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 23.11%
- 1Y
- 79.28%
- 3Y*
- 43.03%
- 5Y*
- 29.45%
- 10Y*
- 25.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUC vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank
AAUC
WPM
AAUC vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Gold Corp (AAUC) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAUC | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.00 | 0.75 | +2.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUC and WPM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AAUC vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison
AAUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUC Allied Gold Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.50% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 1.22% | 1.54% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
AAUC vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUC drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, smaller than the maximum WPM drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUC and WPM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUC | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.45% | -48.64% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -17.32% | +14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -18.86% | +11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.23% | — |
Volatility
AAUC vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAUC | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.60% | 44.61% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 34.45% | +14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 36.83% | +11.77% |
Financials
AAUC vs. WPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Gold Corp and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAUC vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison
AAUC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a gross profit of 130.59M and revenue of 305.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
WPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 673.37M and revenue of 878.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.7%.
AAUC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported an operating income of 96.60M and revenue of 305.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
WPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 660.02M and revenue of 878.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.2%.
AAUC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allied Gold Corp reported a net income of -17.92M and revenue of 305.62M, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
WPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 566.83M and revenue of 878.01M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.