PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASCX vs. TSCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
0.29%4.43%14.60%13.65%-17.85%27.70%21.68%24.51%-12.19%
TSCGX
Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund
-0.76%1.84%10.83%9.90%-22.54%11.30%55.07%30.05%-11.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than TSCGX's -0.76% return.


AASCX

1D
2.82%
1M
-6.45%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.97%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
9.85%

TSCGX

1D
3.81%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AASCX vs. TSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCGX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AASCX vs. TSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASCX
AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TSCGX
TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASCXTSCGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

0.97

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.96

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.18

3.43

-1.25

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the TSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASCX and TSCGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASCXTSCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.01

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.34

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between AASCX and TSCGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Dividend Comparison

AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.93%, more than TSCGX's 0.87% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
14.93%14.98%9.22%1.54%3.15%12.54%3.54%2.92%12.94%0.09%0.10%
TSCGX
Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund
0.87%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.39%2.20%0.50%2.27%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than TSCGX's maximum drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and TSCGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AASCXTSCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-38.84%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-13.48%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-38.84%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-12.54%

+6.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-13.28%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.79%

-0.47%

Volatility

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) is 6.28%, while Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that AASCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AASCXTSCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

8.67%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

14.56%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

23.29%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

23.74%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

24.51%

-3.68%