AASCX vs. TSCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AASCX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund) and TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AASCX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while TSCGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, AASCX returned 6.91%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for TSCGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AASCX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for TSCGX.

Performance

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than TSCGX's 18.27% return.

AASCX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

TSCGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund	15.09%	4.43%	14.60%	13.65%	-17.85%	27.70%	21.68%	24.51%	-12.19%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.27%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	30.05%	-11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AASCX and TSCGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.84

The correlation between AASCX and TSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AASCX vs. TSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASCX

AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AASCX	TSCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.55	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.24	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	2.53	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	8.80	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the TSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASCX and TSCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AASCX	TSCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.55	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.17	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.43	-0.05

Drawdowns

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than TSCGX's maximum drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and TSCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASCX	TSCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.55%	-38.84%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-11.66%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	-27.59%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.80%	-38.84%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-13.09%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.35%	-0.86%

Volatility

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) is 3.47%, while Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that AASCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASCX	TSCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	6.33%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.88%	14.79%	-3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.32%	19.10%	-4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.83%	23.78%	-2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.86%	24.45%	-3.59%

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCGX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

AASCX vs. TSCGX - Dividend Comparison

AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than TSCGX's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund	13.01%	14.98%	9.22%	1.54%	3.15%	12.54%	3.54%	2.92%	12.94%	0.09%	0.10%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.73%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASCX and TSCGX in my portfolio?

AASCX and TSCGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AASCX or TSCGX?

TSCGX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to AASCX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs TSCGX's -38.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.