PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASCX vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASCX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AASCX has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.86%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


AASCX

1D
0.60%
1M
3.52%
YTD
16.10%
6M
13.85%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.86%

VO

1D
0.44%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.30%
6M
9.77%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASCX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
16.10%4.43%14.60%13.65%-17.85%27.70%21.68%24.51%-10.73%8.73%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
11.30%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AASCX and VO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.95

The correlation between AASCX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASCX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASCX
AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASCX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AASCXVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.45

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

9.23

+0.25

AASCX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASCX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AASCX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASCXVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-58.87%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.17%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-19.02%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-27.57%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.67%

-39.37%

-1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.45%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-7.85%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.16%

+0.34%

Volatility

AASCX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.35%. This indicates that AASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASCXVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.35%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

9.80%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

12.80%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

17.66%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

18.98%

+1.91%

AASCX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASCX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
12.90%14.98%9.22%1.54%3.15%12.54%3.54%2.92%12.94%0.09%0.10%0.00%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AASCX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AASCX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to VO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs VO's -58.87%.

AASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASCX and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer