AAPY vs. TSLP
AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while TSLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 43.66% vs 15.63% for TSLP. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AAPY vs. TSLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than TSLP's -8.72% return.
AAPY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY vs. TSLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 14.66% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 9.23% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | -8.72% | 9.77% | 41.53% | 18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY and TSLP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY vs. TSLP — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY
TSLP
AAPY vs. TSLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.10 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 0.49 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 1.20 | +7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.37 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.46 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
AAPY vs. TSLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum TSLP drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and TSLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -46.00% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -32.00% | +17.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -15.68% | +14.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -15.73% | +9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 13.16% | -7.84% |
Volatility
AAPY vs. TSLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) is 6.18%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that AAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 12.75% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 28.48% | -10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 42.87% | -21.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 48.60% | -26.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 48.60% | -26.02% |
AAPY vs. TSLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAPY and TSLP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AAPY vs. TSLP - Dividend Comparison
AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, less than TSLP's 30.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.30% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | 30.32% | 31.05% | 21.82% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY and TSLP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to AAPY (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs TSLP's -46.00%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 43.66% vs 15.63% for TSLP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 43.66% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPY and TSLP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 11.30% for AAPY.
AAPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TSLP is Derivative Income.
AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPY and TSLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer