AAPY vs. PDBC
AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 37.65% vs 33.81% for PDBC. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AAPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
AAPY vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 27.55% return.
AAPY
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.99%
PDBC
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 17.93%
- YTD
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $196.29K | $152.82K | $144.37K | |
| $116.56M | $150.03M | $123.54M |
AAPY vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.73% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 9.18% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 27.55% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY and PDBC is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between AAPY and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY
PDBC
AAPY vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPY | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.05 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 6.77 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPY vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -49.52% | +20.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -16.55% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -10.63% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -23.02% | +16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 5.01% | +0.84% |
Volatility
AAPY vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 7.66%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 7.66% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 16.82% | +6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.17% | 19.73% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 19.29% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 17.85% | +6.07% |
AAPY vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPY vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than PDBC's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.81% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.01% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY and PDBC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPY has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to PDBC (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 37.65% vs 33.81% for PDBC. On fees, PDBC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PDBC has been the lower-risk option at 7.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 37.65% return vs 33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDBC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPY.
AAPY has the higher dividend yield at 11.81%, compared with 3.01% for PDBC.
AAPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPY and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPY and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer