AAPY vs. NFLP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while NFLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 43.66% vs -37.65% for NFLP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

AAPY vs. NFLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than NFLP's -18.61% return.

AAPY

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 13.81%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 43.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLP

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: -12.31%
• YTD: -18.61%
• 6M: -25.81%
• 1Y: -37.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPY vs. NFLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	14.66%	5.04%	20.54%	9.23%
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	-18.61%	-1.54%	53.24%	13.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and NFLP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023	0.24

The correlation between AAPY and NFLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAPY vs. NFLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPY

AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 58
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 50

NFLP

NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPY vs. NFLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPY	NFLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	-1.13	+3.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	-1.65	+4.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.79	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	-0.87	+3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.23	-1.54	+9.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPY vs. NFLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the NFLP Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and NFLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPY	NFLP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	-1.13	+3.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.48	+0.39

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. NFLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum NFLP drawdown of -43.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and NFLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPY	NFLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.22%	-43.48%	+14.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-43.48%	+29.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-41.92%	+40.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	-9.73%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	24.52%	-19.20%

Volatility

AAPY vs. NFLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) is 6.18%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that AAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPY	NFLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	8.15%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.77%	27.72%	-9.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.42%	33.37%	-11.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	28.88%	-6.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	28.88%	-6.30%

AAPY vs. NFLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPY and NFLP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

AAPY vs. NFLP - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, less than NFLP's 26.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	11.30%	12.66%	17.15%	2.16%
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	26.06%	26.56%	19.87%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPY and NFLP in my portfolio?

AAPY and NFLP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPY or NFLP?

NFLP has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to AAPY (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs NFLP's -43.48%.

Which ETF is better, AAPY or NFLP?

On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 43.66% vs -37.65% for NFLP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPY or NFLP?

Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 43.66% return vs -37.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPY or NFLP?

AAPY and NFLP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPY or NFLP?

NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 26.06%, compared with 11.30% for AAPY.

What is the main difference between AAPY and NFLP?

AAPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NFLP is Derivative Income.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.