AAPY vs. AIYY
AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and AIYY (YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while AIYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 43.66% vs -57.47% for AIYY. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AAPY vs. AIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than AIYY's -24.26% return.
AAPY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIYY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -24.26%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -57.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY vs. AIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 14.66% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 1.55% |
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.26% | -58.98% | -14.74% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY and AIYY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY vs. AIYY — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY
AIYY
AAPY vs. AIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPY | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.78 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | -0.84 | +3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | -1.21 | +9.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPY | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | -1.07 | +3.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | -0.83 | +1.69 |
Drawdowns
AAPY vs. AIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum AIYY drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and AIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -79.48% | +50.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -68.33% | +53.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -75.26% | +73.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -41.04% | +34.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 47.63% | -42.31% |
Volatility
AAPY vs. AIYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) is 6.18%, while YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that AAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 15.67% | -9.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 39.16% | -21.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 53.83% | -32.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 50.52% | -27.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 50.52% | -27.94% |
AAPY vs. AIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAPY and AIYY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AAPY vs. AIYY - Dividend Comparison
AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, less than AIYY's 158.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.30% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.78% | 168.33% | 98.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY and AIYY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIYY has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to AAPY (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs AIYY's -79.48%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 43.66% vs -57.47% for AIYY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 43.66% return vs -57.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPY and AIYY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 158.78%, compared with 11.30% for AAPY.
AAPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AIYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax.
AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPY and AIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer