PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPY vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPY vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


AAPY

1D
-1.55%
1M
13.81%
YTD
14.66%
6M
11.04%
1Y
43.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPY vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and AFOS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPY vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPY
AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPY vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPYAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

AAPY vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPYAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

4.35

-3.48

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPYAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-11.52%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.29%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-1.37%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

Volatility

AAPY vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPYAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

20.19%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

20.19%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

20.19%

+2.39%

AAPY vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPY vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
11.30%12.66%17.15%2.16%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPY and AFOS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPY.

AAPY has the higher dividend yield at 11.30%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPY and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPY and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer