PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPL vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed XME with an annualized return of 29.88%, while XME has yielded a comparatively lower 19.14% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
1.82%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.34%
1Y
51.49%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
29.88%

XME

1D
0.16%
1M
4.36%
YTD
16.50%
6M
19.83%
1Y
85.37%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
22.93%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.24%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.50%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and XME is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.38

The correlation between AAPL and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.80

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

9.44

-0.13

AAPL vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, roughly equal to the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-85.89%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-22.60%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-30.47%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-37.27%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-61.69%

+23.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-9.18%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-44.08%

+14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

9.07%

-3.53%

Volatility

AAPL vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 7.00%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

15.14%

-8.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

28.15%

-11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

36.17%

-13.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

32.83%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

32.93%

-3.99%

Dividends

AAPL vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and XME have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to AAPL (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs XME's -85.89%.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer