AAPL vs. XLM-USD
AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.36%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 29.36%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.23% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
AAPL vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and XLM-USD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
XLM-USD
AAPL vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.00 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | -0.40 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | -0.57 | +9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -96.21% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -71.19% | +57.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -74.37% | +41.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -83.25% | +49.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -96.21% | +57.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -78.80% | +71.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.59% | -72.14% | +42.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 50.48% | -44.95% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 43.48% | -36.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 59.28% | -42.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 70.60% | -47.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 74.72% | -47.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 112.79% | -83.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer