AAPL vs. LRCX
AAPL (Apple Inc) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AAPL in Consumer Electronics, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.63%/yr vs 46.35%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 89.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 29.63%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.35% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
LRCX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 89.76%
- 6M
- 99.61%
- 1Y
- 278.49%
- 3Y*
- 76.58%
- 5Y*
- 40.10%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
AAPL vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 89.76% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and LRCX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.38 |
The correlation between AAPL and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.45T
LRCX:
$409.71B
AAPL:
$8.24
LRCX:
$5.29
AAPL:
36.61
LRCX:
61.36
AAPL:
4.82
LRCX:
4.64
AAPL:
9.94
LRCX:
18.98
AAPL:
41.82
LRCX:
38.71
AAPL:
$451.44B
LRCX:
$21.68B
AAPL:
$216.07B
LRCX:
$10.84B
AAPL:
$153.63B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
LRCX
AAPL vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 14.02 | -10.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 47.19 | -38.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 5.46 | -3.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.87 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -87.90% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -20.01% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -47.10% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -56.39% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -56.39% | +17.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -5.60% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -28.18% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 5.93% | -0.45% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 5.68%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 18.51% | -12.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 42.13% | -26.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 51.52% | -29.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 46.25% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 44.76% | -15.85% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than LRCX's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.31% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
AAPL vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAPL vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and LRCX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer