AAPL vs. FLPSX
AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while FLPSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 30.74%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for FLPSX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than FLPSX's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 30.74%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 54.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 18.03%
- 10Y*
- 30.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.46%
FLPSX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 20.78% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 12.47% | 14.69% | 7.23% | 14.41% | -5.69% | 24.46% | 9.34% | 25.75% | -10.80% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and FLPSX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1989 | 0.42 |
The correlation between AAPL and FLPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. FLPSX — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
FLPSX
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.15 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | 7.32 | +2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than FLPSX's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and FLPSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -54.81% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -8.87% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -17.66% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -18.76% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -38.16% | -0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.42% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -5.64% | -23.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 2.60% | +3.19% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison
Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) at 2.43%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 2.43% | +8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 9.15% | +10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 12.57% | +11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 17.13% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.08% | 17.26% | +11.82% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FLPSX's 11.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 11.81% | 13.28% | 16.24% | 18.29% | 9.45% | 12.11% | 11.14% | 8.14% | 13.45% | 7.45% | 4.85% | 4.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and FLPSX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to FLPSX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs FLPSX's -54.81%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and FLPSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer