AAPL vs. CGMU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, AAPL returned 19.11%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for CGMU. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AAPL vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.46% return.

AAPL

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 8.71%
• 1Y: 48.46%
• 3Y*: 19.11%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 29.63%

CGMU

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPL Apple Inc	11.12%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-10.12%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.46%	5.19%	2.64%	6.76%	4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and CGMU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.12

Return for Risk

AAPL vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 88
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 79
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPL	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	3.02	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	4.31	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.65	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	2.71	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	8.76	+0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPL vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPL	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	3.02	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.66	-1.22

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and CGMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPL	CGMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.80%	-4.11%	-77.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-2.55%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.36%	-3.89%	-29.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	-0.82%	-3.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.60%	-0.84%	-28.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.48%	0.79%	+4.69%

Volatility

AAPL vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.82%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPL	CGMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	0.82%	+4.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.99%	1.74%	+14.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.41%	2.29%	+20.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.47%	3.47%	+24.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.91%	3.47%	+25.44%

Dividends

AAPL vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than CGMU's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAPL Apple Inc	0.35%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPL and CGMU in my portfolio?

AAPL and CGMU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPL or CGMU?

AAPL has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to CGMU (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.