AAPB vs. NVD
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 106.72% vs -67.15% for NVD. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.
Performance
AAPB vs. NVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -34.83% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 106.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -18.10%
- YTD
- -34.83%
- 6M
- -40.44%
- 1Y
- -67.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 23.70% | -0.93% | 47.02% | 10.39% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -34.83% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and NVD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | -0.26 |
AAPB vs. NVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPB
NVD
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AAPB
NVD
Basic Materials
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Communication Services
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Consumer Cyclical
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Consumer Defensive
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Energy
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Financial Services
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Healthcare
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Industrials
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Real Estate
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Utilities
AAPB
-
NVD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
NVD
AAPB vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPB | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.81 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | -0.93 | +4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | -1.41 | +10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPB | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | -0.98 | +3.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.87 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and NVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -99.26% | +41.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -72.64% | +44.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -99.12% | +95.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -81.65% | +62.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 47.63% | -35.99% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 11.20%, while GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a volatility of 26.02%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 26.02% | -14.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.96% | 52.01% | -20.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.82% | 68.60% | -23.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 92.60% | -41.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 92.60% | -41.27% |
AAPB vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than NVD's 18.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.55% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.15% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and NVD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (26.02%) compared to AAPB (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs NVD's -99.26%.
On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 106.72% vs -67.15% for NVD. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 11.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 106.72% return vs -67.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.15%, compared with 3.55% for AAPB.
AAPB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 1.50% for NVD.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and NVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer