AAPB vs. NVD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 90.68% vs -61.62% for NVD. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.

Performance

AAPB vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -26.99% return.

AAPB

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: -9.88%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 90.68%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVD

• 1D: 8.30%
• 1M: 10.83%
• YTD: -26.99%
• 6M: -24.81%
• 1Y: -61.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPB vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	10.97%	-0.93%	47.02%	12.07%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-26.99%	-73.27%	-93.09%	-15.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and NVD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.27

AAPB vs. NVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPB	NVD
Technology	66.7%	199.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPB vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 60
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPB	NVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	-0.87	+2.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	-1.34	+3.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.85	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	-0.89	+4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	-1.39	+9.04

AAPB vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and NVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and NVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPB	NVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.13%	-99.26%	+41.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.11%	-69.44%	+41.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.26%	-99.02%	+85.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-81.86%	+62.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.89%	47.02%	-35.13%

Volatility

AAPB vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 14.32%, while GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a volatility of 26.72%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPB	NVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.32%	26.72%	-12.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.46%	54.57%	-21.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.34%	71.22%	-25.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.27%	92.58%	-41.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.27%	92.58%	-41.31%

AAPB vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPB vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than NVD's 16.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	3.96%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	16.20%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPB and NVD in my portfolio?

AAPB and NVD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPB or NVD?

NVD has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to AAPB (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs NVD's -99.26%.

Which ETF is better, AAPB or NVD?

On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 90.68% vs -61.62% for NVD. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 14.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPB or NVD?

Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 90.68% return vs -61.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPB or NVD?

AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPB or NVD?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 16.20%, compared with 3.96% for AAPB.

What is the main difference between AAPB and NVD?

AAPB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 1.50% for NVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.