AALGX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
AALGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 15, 1987. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | -1.71% | 20.49% | 27.79% | 21.71% | -19.38% | 20.37% | 14.46% | 22.71% | -8.75% | 10.85% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AALGX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
AALGX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AALGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AALGX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
AALGX
FGIAX
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AALGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.79 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 2.30 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.73 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 12.62 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AALGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.79 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AALGX and FGIAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
AALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.24%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | 11.24% | 11.05% | 23.12% | 5.51% | 3.21% | 14.40% | 3.01% | 12.68% | 9.82% | 1.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AALGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -49.35% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -8.29% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.65% | -21.08% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -38.02% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -3.06% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.56% | -7.22% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.79% | +0.72% |
Volatility
AALGX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that AALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AALGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 4.15% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.07% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 12.28% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 13.08% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 15.17% | +3.14% |