PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.79%
YTD
8.91%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
0.65%
1M
0.40%
YTD
25.81%
6M
24.44%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and FTIF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.25

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAEQ
FTIF

Technology

35.9%
4.1%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
3.2%

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Industrials

7.9%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.8%
44.1%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
20.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
12.1%

Technology

AAEQ
35.9%
FTIF
4.1%

Financial Services

AAEQ
11.8%
FTIF

-

Communication Services

AAEQ
11.7%
FTIF

-

Consumer Cyclical

AAEQ
10.3%
FTIF
3.2%

Healthcare

AAEQ
8.6%
FTIF

-

Industrials

AAEQ
7.9%
FTIF
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

AAEQ
4.4%
FTIF

-

Energy

AAEQ
3.8%
FTIF
44.1%

Utilities

AAEQ
2.4%
FTIF

-

Basic Materials

AAEQ
1.7%
FTIF
20.1%

Real Estate

AAEQ
1.5%
FTIF
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAEQFTIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.75

+0.33

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and FTIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-27.83%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.50%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-6.00%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

15.00%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

18.96%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

18.96%

-5.24%

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FTIF's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.11%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and FTIF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.60% for FTIF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and FTIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer