PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.65% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.83%
6M
12.87%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CAOS

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.02%
6M
-0.03%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.64K$18.70K$31.51K
$6.99M$5.50M$4.97M

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
11.53%-1.11%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.65%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and CAOS is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAEQCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-3.89%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.24%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-0.92%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

1.56%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

4.17%

+9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

4.17%

+9.91%

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and CAOS have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

AAEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

AAEQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.63% for CAOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer