AAEQ vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAEQ (Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAEQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 16.77% return.

AAEQ

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 16.77%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF	5.97%	-1.11%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	16.77%	1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and BLCR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.91

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAEQ	BLCR
Technology	40.5%	34.3%
Communication Services	12.2%	14.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	11.1%
Healthcare	9.0%	7.6%
Industrials	6.1%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	2.9%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Utilities	1.5%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.1%	2.2%

Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 82
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAEQ	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.02	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.20	—

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAEQ	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-21.29%	+11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.43%	-2.70%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-2.19%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAEQ	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.32%	16.45%	-2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	17.67%	-3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.32%	17.67%	-3.35%

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAEQ vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than BLCR's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAEQ and BLCR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AAEQ and BLCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, AAEQ or BLCR?

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAEQ or BLCR?

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAEQ or BLCR?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

What is the main difference between AAEQ and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.36% for BLCR.