AADR vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. AADR is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AADR returned 6.23%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for SENT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

AADR vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AADR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: -1.56%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF	-1.56%	25.63%	24.58%	18.67%	-22.93%	1.59%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AADR and SENT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.48

The correlation between AADR and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AADR vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AADR	SENT
Healthcare	17.9%	24.8%
Basic Materials	16.9%	3.0%
Financial Services	14.6%	6.1%
Industrials	14.6%	14.6%
Technology	9.5%	26.2%
Energy	7.6%	10.3%
Communication Services	7.4%	1.9%
Utilities	5.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	3.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

AADR vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR

AADR Risk / Return Rank: 15
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AADR	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AADR	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	-0.36	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	-0.25	+0.68

Drawdowns

AADR vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AADR	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.01%	-30.34%	-14.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	0.00%	-19.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.61%	-15.83%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.80%	-30.34%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.54%	-27.23%	+14.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-20.90%	+11.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.82%	0.00%	+6.82%

Volatility

AADR vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AADR	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.34%	0.00%	+6.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	0.00%	+17.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.33%	0.00%	+21.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	12.66%	+9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	13.32%	+8.88%

AADR vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

AADR vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF	0.54%	0.49%	1.33%	0.74%	3.65%	0.92%	0.11%	0.58%	0.75%	0.74%	0.58%	0.81%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AADR and SENT in my portfolio?

AADR and SENT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AADR or SENT?

AADR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, AADR or SENT?

On 5-year performance, AADR leads with 6.23% vs -4.51% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AADR or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, AADR has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AADR or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AADR or SENT?

AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between AADR and SENT?

AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while SENT is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 1.01% for SENT.