PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AADR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.37%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.


AADR

1D
-0.81%
1M
1.19%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
0.87%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
9.37%

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
-0.78%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%6.48%13.13%35.35%-31.55%47.76%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AADR and QQQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2010

0.58

The correlation between AADR and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

AADR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AADR
QQQ

Healthcare

17.9%
4.2%

Basic Materials

16.9%
1.1%

Financial Services

14.6%
0.2%

Industrials

14.6%
2.8%

Technology

9.5%
53.8%

Energy

7.6%
0.6%

Communication Services

7.4%
15.8%

Utilities

5.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
7.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Healthcare

AADR
17.9%
QQQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

AADR
16.9%
QQQ
1.1%

Financial Services

AADR
14.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

AADR
14.6%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

AADR
9.5%
QQQ
53.8%

Energy

AADR
7.6%
QQQ
0.6%

Communication Services

AADR
7.4%
QQQ
15.8%

Utilities

AADR
5.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AADR
3.9%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

AADR
2.2%
QQQ
7.7%

Real Estate

AADR

-

QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADRQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

2.73

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

3.55

-2.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.47

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.71

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.61

14.30

-12.69

AADR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.73

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.83

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Drawdowns

AADR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-82.97%

+37.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-11.96%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.61%

-22.77%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-35.12%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.01%

-35.12%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

0.00%

-11.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-32.79%

+23.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.77%

3.11%

+3.66%

Volatility

AADR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

4.48%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.56%

12.11%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

15.95%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

22.39%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

22.30%

-0.10%

AADR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
0.53%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADR has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.97% vs 9.37% for AADR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer