AADR vs. POW
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
AADR vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -4.11% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
POW
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -13.79%
- 6M
- 25.01%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -4.11% | 2.15% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 35.68% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and POW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AADR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AADR | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AADR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -20.28% | -24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.81% | -20.28% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -4.56% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | — | — |
Volatility
AADR vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 33.06% | -11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 33.06% | -11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 33.06% | -10.93% |
AADR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.84% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and POW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.
AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for AADR and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer